Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
In-Reply-To: <4039EC14.7010602@web.de>
References: <4039DE3E.6050204@web.de>
 <34170.10.0.0.5.1077535351.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
 <4039EC14.7010602@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <36121A3C-660C-11D8-8273-000A95782782@forthillcompany.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian McCallister <mccallister@forthillcompany.com>
Subject: Re: [vote] 1.0 final release
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:26:04 -0500
To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>

+1 as long as known issues are clearly documented =)

-Brian

On Feb 23, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Thomas Mahler wrote:

> Hi Antonio,
>
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> Hi Thomas:
>> This is great to see a OJB 1.0! I will prefer to fix the errors, even 
>> in
>> ODMG.
>
> of course we will fix the errors. But there are 3 testcases that fail 
> because they expect behaviour that is simply not implemented in the 
> current ODMG design.
> I think it's OK to just state this in the release notes without any 
> further yction for 1.0.
>
>
> Also what is the status of JDO? Are the test working here?
>
> Good news! we have 100% working tests here! (not so difficult with a 
> total of zero test-cases ;-))
>
> thomas
>
>> Best Regards,
>> Antonio Gallardo.
>> Thomas Mahler dijo:
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> Armin and I talked about getting out the 1.0 release. We both think 
>>> that
>>> it's good to get it out asap.
>>>
>>> I propose to assemble the relase during the next weekend (28./29.2.)
>>> So I'd like to see your votes, please.
>>>
>>> If we get no vetos we'll have to fix some nasty regressions in our
>>> testbed.
>>> There are three failures in the ODMG layer which can't be fixed 
>>> without
>>> a major redesign. So I propose to not fix them in 1.0, but to place a
>>> note in the "known issues" section.
>>>
>>> The latest changes to the Criteria stuff causes several errors in the
>>> ODMG testcases. I'll have a look at them today.
>>>
>>> There are also 5 errors in the OTM tests. they seem to be caused by
>>> incosistencies in the testdata. (constraint violations). OTM 
>>> developers:
>>> please have a look at those issues, can't be a big problem.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org