Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69443 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 19:45:48 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 19:45:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 77198 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2004 19:45:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 77169 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2004 19:45:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 77145 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 19:45:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.fridayfives.net) (209.137.167.162) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 19:45:35 -0000 Received: from kamajii.forthill.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AEF31F426 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:45:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.30] (kite.forthill.int [192.168.1.30]) by mail.fridayfives.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DFE1F425 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:45:39 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) In-Reply-To: <4027E19E.7020303@gmx.ch> References: <4027E19E.7020303@gmx.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <032421CB-5B39-11D8-8432-000A95782782@forthillcompany.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Brian McCallister Subject: Re: Release 1.0 and API changes in Platform Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:49:03 -0500 To: "OJB Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N A while back Thomas said he wanted to re-branch 1.0 as it was taking so long and had gotten out of synch, so I think checking into head is fine. I am for releasing 1.0 ASAP if there are no blocker or major level bugs. Early, often is a nice way to do it. -Brian On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:38 PM, Jakob Braeuchi wrote: > hi all, > > i found a problem in BrokerHelper#getCountQuery(). the handling of > distinct queries is not correct. i think i have a solution for this > problem but it would require changes in platform :( a new method to > concatenate strings needs to be added. > > i do not like to change the api in a release-candidate, but i think > changing platform has not a big impact. > > afaik the release 1.0 is not yet out. is there a release-date > available ? do we use the current 1.0 branch for the release or will > there be another branch ? > i'm not sure if i have to make these changes to trunk and branch ? > > > jakob > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org