db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jakob Braeuchi <jbraeu...@gmx.ch>
Subject Re: JDO, was 1.0 final release
Date Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:25:21 GMT
hi thomas,

i assume that those jdo-implementations have their own or-mapper under the hood 
  and i doubt that they are eager to change it.
but of course it would reasonable to put such a tool on top of ojb.

jakob


Thomas Dudziak wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Brian McCallister wrote:
> 
> 
>>What *are* people's thoughts on this? I heard support for the JDO-lite, 
>>but putting effort into JDO-lite instead of JDO is a serious question.
> 
> 
> I would vote for a complete implementation of JDO, but I wonder whether
> there is need for YAOSJI (yet another open source JDO implementation).
> There at least four that I know of:
> 
> http://jpox.sourceforge.net/
> http://xorm.sourceforge.net/
> http://speedo.objectweb.org/
> http://tjdo.sourceforge.net/ 
> 
> Wouldn't it be more useful to approach one of them and propose an
> adaptation of their framework so that it uses OJB (AFAIK tjdo has an
> Apache License which would ease things) ?
> 
> Just my 2ct ;-)
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message