Return-Path: 
 <ojb-dev-return-7148-apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 70816 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 12:27:08 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 12:27:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 45883 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2004 12:27:06 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45809 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2004 12:27:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ojb-dev-subscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45795 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 12:27:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.ppi.de) (194.180.18.10)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 12:27:05 -0000
Received: from max.ppinet.de (max.ppinet.de [172.31.43.64])
	by mail.ppi.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i0KCR3h23708
	for <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:27:03 +0100
Received: by max.ppinet.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <DJPW9TZQ>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:27:04 +0100
Message-ID: <6D48B8403D926449BDE8440EC7EEC46D01011025@max.ppinet.de>
From: oliver.matz@ppi.de
To: ojb-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: RE: Do we really need three Sybase Platform classes?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:27:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hello Armin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Armin Waibel [mailto:armin@code-au-lait.de]
> 
> in platform package we declared three Sybase specific 
> platform classes:
> - PlatformSybaseImpl
> - PlatformSybaseASAImpl
> - PlatformSybaseASEImpl

I stumbled over that, too.  I though it was
for backward compatibility. 

I have the impression that there are very few
Sybase users, only two or so (including us).
So there won't be much complaint if we drop
PlatformSybaseImpl.

If we keep PlatformSybaseImpl, it should become a 
common superclass for PlatformSybaseASAImpl and 
PlatformSybaseASEImpl, shouldn't it?

At least PlatformSybaseImpl and PlatformSybaseASAImpl
should be related by inheritance in some way, because
they are identical if I am right. 

Olli

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org