db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <mccallis...@forthillcompany.com>
Subject Re: OTM and 1.0
Date Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:46:29 GMT
Ah hah, the otm-dependent attribute handles this =)

Cool, OTM docs on the way.

Once again, the OTM is awesome, major kudos to Raghu, Matt, Oleg et al!

-Brian

On Jan 17, 2004, at 11:10 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:

> On Jan 17, 2004, at 4:59 AM, Oleg Nitz wrote:
>>> 1) Is the query-by-criteria against the OTM supposed to do ODMG style
>>> retrieval of references/collections? (as the OTM specifies ODMG style
>>> retrieval semantics in the repository mappings).
>> I don't understand the difference between "ODMG style retrieval" and
>> "another (?) style retrieval". AFAIK there is just only style of 
>> retrieval.
>> OTM has a special "style" of update, but I guess you know about this.
>
> The auto-retrieve, auto-update, and auto-delete attributes relevant to 
> PB behavior, but for which the ODMG and OTM specify specific needed 
> (the default) values of false as they handle retrieval of references 
> at their level.
>
> IMHO it makes sense for the OTM to auto-retrieve references even if 
> you use the PB API against it as at that point the PB API is just a 
> client API, not a service API (if it remains exposed through the OTM). 
> Right now referenced collections are not retrieved.
>
> Does this make any sense?
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message