Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <3FF1DA2D.8070005@gmx.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:03:57 +0100
From: Jakob Braeuchi <jbraeuchi@gmx.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OJB Developers List <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 1.0 release date
References: <3FEE273D.7010106@code-au-lait.de> <3FEEB519.5020903@web.de>
 <3FEFF4D6.5080407@code-au-lait.de> <3FF03B04.2020309@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <3FF03B04.2020309@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hi thomas,

January 4th is ok for me, so we have a little more time.
i'll have a look at SAPDB.

i noticed some warnings when runnning the testcases: "No value for key 
'CollectionProxyClass'" and "No value for key 'InterceptorClass'" ?

jakob

Thomas Mahler wrote:

> hi all,
> 
> I hope you all enjoyed your christmas holidays!
> 
> As the proposed 1.0 release date comes closer I'd like to discuss some 
> issues.
> 
> In an offline email thread Armin and I agreed that that there are still 
> some important things to do before we should finalize the 1.0 release.
> 
> As all those things need time we both think that it would be better to 
> shift the release from Dec. 28th to Jan. 4th.
> 
> Are there any strong reason why we should stick to the 28th? As far as I 
> know this date was not announced to a wider audience, so there should be 
> no bad press for this?
> 
> Here are some open tasks. I'd prefer to share this work among developers 
> to reduce the release workload.
> 
> - Checking Junit test against all Major database platforms (hsql, mysql, 
> postgresql, oracle, sapdb, mssql, db2)
> Assigned to: thma (HSQL and MYSQL).
> 
> - Checking Junit test against different combinations of OJB.properties 
> settings (e.g. ObjectCache, ConnectionFactory, Pool, etc.)
> 
> - verifying the EJB examples against Jboss, etc.
> 
> - verifying that the tutorial apps work.
> Assigned to: thma
> 
> - add a known issues section to the release note.
> Assigned to: thma
> 
> - Use fixed SerialVersion UIDs for serializable classes to avoid 
> serialization problems with futures builds.
> Assigned to: thma
> 
> Any other things that are not yet covered?
> Please check if you can help with any of these things and assign 
> yourself a task or two.
> 
> cu,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org