db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Armin Waibel <ar...@code-au-lait.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Design bug fixed - check in?
Date Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:58:30 GMT
Hi Antonio,

I thought Thomas has fixed the problems with JDO 1.0.1 jar?
Step back to your "Re: OJB and JDO 1.01" post:

 > NestedThrowablesStackTrace:
 > javax.jdo.JDOFatalInternalException: Not a JDO class: test.Area
 > at org.apache.ojb.jdori.sql.OjbStoreManager.getJDOClass(Unknown
 > Source)

This seems a problem not related to OJB. Did you enhance your classes 
with 1.0.1 enhancer again?

regards,
Armin

Antonio Gallardo wrote:

> Armin Waibel dijo:
> 
>>Hi all,
>>
>>seems there are no negative votes, some neutral and
>>a few positive.
>>Thus I will start today with the check in of the "design bug fix".
>>
>>I think 95% of the users will not note the change of the three internal
>>kernel interface method signatures. But I also put a note to the
>>release-notes. I asked Thomas to label the current CVS before I start
>>with my check in.
>>The label is
>>OJB_1_0_RC4_20031128
> 
> 
> I noted problem with the JDO 1.01 implementation. Nobody answer my mails
> to this. Can someone almost tell is the new JDO 1.01 is working well with
> OJB?
> 
> Can be this a stoper for the release?
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Antonio Gallardo
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message