Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97500 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2003 21:58:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2003 21:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 53877 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2003 21:58:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 53845 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2003 21:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 53802 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2003 21:58:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com) (216.6.48.60) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2003 21:58:28 -0000 Received: from ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9QLwXIc002989 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:58:33 -0600 Received: (from apache@localhost) by ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h9QLwXAo002987; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:58:33 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com: apache set sender to agallardo@agsoftware.dnsalias.com using -f Received: from 10.0.0.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user agallardo) by ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:58:33 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <33274.10.0.0.5.1067205513.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:58:33 -0600 (CST) Subject: About TJDO and JDO implementation in OJB From: "Antonio Gallardo" To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi: I saw the TJDO project - http://sourceforge.net/projects/tjdo/ It is a JDO implementation. The TJDO License is Apache! I think we should support this implementation instead of the Sun JDO. Or even better integrate or base our planned JDO version on TJDO. What you think? The problem I see with the Sun JDO implementation is that we cannot distribute it. So it complicate the life to people as me that want to use JDO. Of course, this is not an issue for TJDO. Please comments about that. If you agree I will be glad to contact the guys there and tell them about what we mean about TJDO. :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org