Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47235 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2003 12:23:50 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2003 12:23:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 95744 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2003 12:23:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 95718 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2003 12:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 95704 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2003 12:23:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ns.alma.nu) (195.84.38.252) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2003 12:23:47 -0000 Received: from 217-212-20-240.customer.telia.com ([217.212.20.240]) by ns.alma.nu (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1) with SMTP ID 465 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:23:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Proposal] Infrastructure change From: Per-Olof Noren To: OJB Developers List In-Reply-To: <3F99443C.6030904@web.de> References: <1066995913.20545.240.camel@wpernor> <3F99443C.6030904@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1067257394.20548.332.camel@wpernor> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2-3mdk Date: 27 Oct 2003 13:23:14 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 17:24, Thomas Mahler wrote: > Hi Per-Olof, > > Per-Olof Noren wrote: > > Hello all, > > Given the problems using scarab that people (including myself) > > I agree, scarab can be a real PITA. > > > seems to > > be having, I would like to propose that OJB switches to using the apache > > standard bugzilla instead. > > Mhh. When we launched OJB at Jakarta everybody told us: > "Do not use Bugzilla, it's dying and will be replaced by Scarab completely. > Use Scarab, it has a much better feature set and over time all apache > projects will move to scarab." > > So I'm a bit sceptic about switching back to bugzilla. Understood. > > Bugzilla probably isn't the better product, > > but people knows how to operate it and is use to it. > > I think (based on lurking on coccon-dev) that the infrastructure guys > > would be more than happy to help us with this? > > I'd like to see a clear statement by the infrastructure team like > "Bugzilla is the recoomended bug tracking solution at Apache. Scarab is > not recommended and won't be supported." I'm not subscribed to infrastructure@ but they do have an opinion on this? > My point is that it's not fun to switch infrastructure each week. We got > very bad press for the infrastructure changes for the mail-list archives > some month ago. > I'd be more than happy to not repeat this expereience. I can see your point, although i do believe that if we were to let them know how we feel and what we'd like to do, they'll help us out with no friction. It's a little community building that is needed. I'm not pursing this until end of days, but I am willing to invest a little time in it because I feel that our community here would benefit from it. :-) Regards, Per-Olof Nor�n --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org