Return-Path: 
 <ojb-dev-return-5825-apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 25749 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 17:11:25 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 17:11:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 71493 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2003 17:11:08 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 71395 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2003 17:11:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ojb-dev-subscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 71306 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 17:11:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO s1.com) (139.131.240.43)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 17:11:06 -0000
Received: from ([10.6.65.127])
	by ferric.s1.com with ESMTP ;
	Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:09:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nrcw2kexg01.norc.s1.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
	id <TA8T8RTV>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:09:30 -0400
Message-ID: <E41BC986080E2648A0CD1A31A94EF9CC0271B162@nrcw2kexg03.norc.s1.com>
From: Raghuram Rajah <raghuram.rajah@s1.com>
To: 'OJB Developers List' <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: RE: OTM + Connections/Transactions
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:09:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi Brian,

How do multiple connections help there? Without a 2PC to co-ordinate the
two-connections you would just merely end up with non-ACID transactions.

Raghu.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian McCallister [mailto:mccallister@forthillcompany.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:25 PM
To: OJB Developers List
Subject: Re: OTM + Connections/Transactions


inline

On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 03:50 PM, Raghuram Rajah wrote:
> And why
> would one want to do that? I could not think of a single reason why one
> would want to do that. If you think you have a valid reason, it should 
> be
> very trivial to implement.

Long transactions.

-Brian


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org