Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 4739 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2003 13:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 4597 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 13:34:10 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 13:34:10 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 2674AC8521 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:34:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.46]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003080815340656:3140 ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:34:06 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: "OJB Developers List" Subject: RE: [Proposal] Enhancing references Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:36:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-reply-to: <3BA212AF4C35DF4EAED65864F20F6C9E3FA9EC@dozer.whisperwire.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 08.08.2003 15:34:06, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 08.08.2003 15:34:07, Serialize complete at 08.08.2003 15:34:07 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Lance Eason wrote: > > I think the anonymous fields implementation specifically > addresses this already. > Great! Is this somewhere documented? Carsten > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de] > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 8:27 AM > To: OJB Developers List > Subject: [Proposal] Enhancing references > > > Hi, > > I'm wondering if you have interest in patching the mapping for the > reference-descriptor? AFAIK, currently you have to define > a field-descriptor holding the key of the referenced object. Therefore, > you have to create a property in your class for this key. > This property is only needed by ojb and it's a little bit ugly to > have it there. So it should be possible to change this in order > to not have to explictly define the descriptor and the property. > > I don't know much about ojb right now, but I guess it's possible > to change this. If you are interested, I will try to implement it, > so it might take some time. > > Interested? > > Cheers > Carsten > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org