Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 76172 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2003 08:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 76029 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2003 08:50:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO souvenirchina.com) (211.152.51.122) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2003 08:50:52 -0000 Received: from snowicemiao [202.117.121.81] by souvenirchina.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.11 ) id A5FCD00B0; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 16:51:08 +0800 From: "=?GB2312?Q?=C3=E7=C6=F4=B9=E3?=" Reply-To: mqg@souvenirchina.com To: ojb-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: db-ojb/xdocs performance.xml X-mailer: Foxmail 4.2 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 16:51:33 +0800 Message-Id: <200308091651187.SM00872@snowicemiao> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N =D4=DA 2003-08-09 06:35:00 =C4=FA=D0=B4=B5=C0=A3=BA >of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ >arminw 2003/08/08 23:35:20 > > Modified: xdocs performance.xml > Log: > repair links > > Revision Changes Path > 1.14 +14 -14 db-ojb/xdocs/performance.xml > > Index: performance.xml > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D > RCS file: /home/cvs/db-ojb/xdocs/performance.xml,v > retrieving revision 1.13 > retrieving revision 1.14 > diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 > --- performance.xml=0930 Jun 2003 13:46:24 -0000=091.13 > +++ performance.xml=099 Aug 2003 06:35:20 -0000=091.14 > @@ -15,16 +15,16 @@ > > > > > - > + >

" > There is no such thing as a free lunch."
>
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ >

>
> > - > + >

> The OJB Performance Test Suite allows to compare OJB > against native JDBC programming > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ > > > > - > + >

> Interpreting the result of these benchmarks carefully will= help to > decide whether using OJB is viable for specific application= scenarios > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ > > > > - > + >

> OJB is shipped with tests compares native JDBC with ODMG and > PB-API implementation. > @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ > > > > - > + > >

> This test was created to check the performance and stability= of the > @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ > > > > - > + > >

> Many user ask this question and there is more than one= answer. But OJB was > @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ > > > > - > + >

> We don't know, that depends from the environment OJB runs= (hardware, database, driver, application server, ...). > But there are some settings which affect the= performance: > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------= ----- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org > > mqg - SOUVENIR ----------- --------. | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:sales@souvenirchina.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org