db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Mahler <thm...@web.de>
Subject Re: cvs commit: db-ojb/src/jca/org/apache/ojb/otm/connector OTMJCAConnection.java
Date Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:51:35 GMT
Hi again,

Brian McCallister wrote:
> Part of the JDO spec is that class enhancement *should be* portable. So 
> JDORI enhancement should pass along.

+1

> I know TJDO uses the JDORI enhancer, they have a nice ant task to 
> automate it, but it is LGPL'd so I am re-implementing one at the moment 
> that uses the JDORI enhancer. Will contribute it back to OJB when it is 
> finished if anyone wants it.

me want!

Thomas

> -Brian
> 
> On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Ketan Gangatirkar wrote:
> 
>>
>> Matthew,
>>
>> Is the new implementation still compatible with the JDORI enhancement? 
>> Going by what I know of the enhancer stuff, it should be.  If so, then 
>> the conversion to a home-grown JDO could just happen in a more 
>> piecemeal fashion.  It's definitely a big step to have the run-time be 
>> OJB JDO-only, with no JDORI components.  Since the number of people 
>> deploying OJB JDO-based apps will greatly exceed the number of people 
>> actually building those apps, I don't think it's a bad thing to rely 
>> on the JDORI enhancer for a while.  Only the developers would have to 
>> concern themselves with it; deployers wouldn't know and wouldn't care, 
>> since what they deploy wouldn't change.  I guess what I'm suggesting 
>> is that the focus be on the run-time until that's stable and doing the 
>> enhancer at a later date.
>>
>>
>> Matthew Baird wrote:
>>
>>> Yes! Extra special thanks to Oleg and Raghu.
>>> We're not that far away from a working implementation. I figure it
>>> should only take about a week to get the whole thing working, with
>>> the exception of the enhancer. I'm not sure I know exactly how to
>>> build a proper enhancer yet, but it doesn't look like it'll be too
>>> hard. If anyone has any ideas on this, pitch in!
>>> I've got some interesting ideas for the connector so you can use any
>>> of the object-level APIs (OTM, ODMG, JDO) in a mix-and-match fashion.
>>> I wouldn't recommend using the PB api in a container. We still need
>>> to refactor the ODMG to use the OTM, that's not high on my list,
>>> maybe someone with more ODMG experience can take a shot at it.
>>> cheers, Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message