Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 60083 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 18:38:20 -0000 Received: from delmar-209-137-167-162-dsl.cavtel.net (HELO mail.fridayfives.net) (209.137.167.162) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2003 18:38:20 -0000 Received: by mail.fridayfives.net (Postfix, from userid 60999) id D528BBFA0; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:38:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from forthillcompany.com (kite.forthill.int [192.168.1.30]) by mail.fridayfives.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5A8BF83 for ; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:38:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:38:20 -0400 Subject: Re: Mapping of objects without identity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Brian McCallister To: "OJB Developers List" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=8.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL version=2.43 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N To answer my own question, I see that it has. Woo hoo. -Brian On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 02:16 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: > Did anonymous fields like this get put into cvs and the release=20 > candidates? > > If so... another howto is imminent. > > -Brian > > On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 10:36 AM, TINE Houari (OBJECTIVA) wrote: > >> Add the following in class descriptor of Dates: >> > "INTEGER " >> primarykey=3D "true " autoincrement=3D "true " access=3D "anonymous " = /> >> Houar >> >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Rice Yeh [mailto:riceyeh@yahoo.com] >> Envoy=E9 : lundi 12 mai 2003 11:04 >> =C0 : OJB Users List >> Objet : RE: Mapping of objects without identity >> >> Hi Houar, >> I know anonymous field in your previous mail. But I >> still wonder how anonymous field solution is applied >> in this problem. >> >> Regards, >> Rice >> >> >> --- "TINE Houari (OBJECTIVA)" >> wrote: >>> Another solution: you can use anonymous field. >>> >>> Houar >>> >>> -----Message d'origine----- >>> De : Thomas P飉chmann >>> [mailto:t.poeschmann@exxcellent.de] >>> Envoy?: samedi 10 mai 2003 18:39 >>> ?: OJB Users List >>> Objet : Re: Mapping of objects without identity >>> >>> Hi Rice, >>> >>>> You may use nested fields to have DATE1 mapped >>> to >>>> dates->date1 and DATE2 mapped to dates->date2. >>> >>> This sound like a solution for my problem - I will >>> try it out ASAP. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> ojb-user-help@db.apache.org >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> ojb-user-help@db.apache.org >>> >> >> >> __________________________________ >> Do you Yahoo!? >> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. >> http://search.yahoo.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org > >