Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66688 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 09:53:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO noc.iplexx.net) (216.234.186.118) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 09:53:07 -0000 Received: from EUROPA (chello062178030041.11.11.vie.surfer.at [62.178.30.41]) by ip-66-51-116-21.tera-byte.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h349x8U08422 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:59:08 +0200 From: "Florian Bruckner" To: "OJB Developers List" Subject: AW: reversedb-2: looking for idea Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:52:17 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Anthony, > I guess I will have some time now to give some effort to the > reversedb2. As > a first step, I will not try to be ambitious and just to float it. good to hear! > Before I start I wonder if there is anyway that the reversedb can > reuse any > component in ojb which currently take care of the processing of the > repository*.xml. My idea is to create a closer tie of reversedb's xml > generation to the ojb codebase. The code in reversedb-2 for reading the repository is based on an older version of OJB. AFAIK Armin did a lot of refactoring in the repository code and commented the pieces of code in reverse-db2 that were breaking the build. So this part of reversedb2 is completely broken now. I do not know the details of the current OJB repository handling, but we should use this code at least to read a repository.xml. When it comes to writing a repository.xml file I do not know whether this is still included in the code (before the refactoring took place it was). [...] > For last few months I did not see anyone posted here saying he/she is > working on reversedb2. If actually someone has started working on it but I > just failed to read it from the newgroup, it is my fault. I would be very > happy to see how I can assist in the development if it is already > undertaken > by someone else. The last change I made was applying your changes to reversedb. I haven't touched reversedb-2 for a while. > > Regards, > > > Anthony > > regards, Florian