Hi Per-Olof,
<snip>
>
> The questions that arise are:
> 1. Does this make sence?
Yes!
> 2. If it doesn´t, is there possibly another smart way of doing this?
IMO it's the natural choice to do it in the way you propose.
> 3. If it does, would a solution like this have impact on
> client-server
> mode (since PBAbstractImpl resiseds in singlevm-package)?
Yes, it would affect C/S mode. But as we discontinued the C/S mode it's not
a real issue ;-)
> 4. If I implement this, would this project be interested in
> incorporating the changes?
Yes!
cheers,
Thomas
>
> PS.
> My ugly fix is add a jcdAlias attribute to my beans (and not
> map them) ,
> and iterate over them, setting the jcdAlias for this
> transaction before
> every update.
> As you all see, I´m quite keen on response on a better solution than
> this. The ugly fix below is not very tempting...but I need to
> have this
> working by Monday morning......
> DS.
>
> Regards,
> Per-Olof
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>
|