Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 92228 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2003 16:37:04 -0000 Received: from mail.gmx.net (213.165.65.60) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2003 16:37:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 10382 invoked by uid 0); 21 Mar 2003 16:37:06 -0000 Received: from adsl-62-167-203-207.adslplus.ch (HELO gmx.ch) (62.167.203.207) by mail.gmx.net (mp004-rz3) with SMTP; 21 Mar 2003 16:37:06 -0000 Message-ID: <3E7B3FAA.90209@gmx.ch> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:36:58 +0100 From: Jakob Braeuchi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OJB Developers List Subject: Re: Optimistic Locking change References: <3E7A321A.3050506@sundayta.com> <3E7AB16C.2070304@web.de> <3E7AD534.1080605@sundayta.com> In-Reply-To: <3E7AD534.1080605@sundayta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi david, +1 for your proposal jakob David Warnock wrote: > Thomas Mahler wrote: > >> Here is my >> +1 >> for this proposal >> >> I'm willing to review your patch! > > > Many thanks Thomas. No doubt you have seen that I have gone ahead and > prepared the patch and sent to the list with a subject of > "PATCH: updateLock added to improve Optimistic Locking" > > Thanks > > Dave