Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15694 invoked by uid 98); 26 Jan 2003 23:13:23 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Received: (qmail 15675 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2003 23:13:21 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2003 23:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 78087 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2003 23:11:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 78080 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2003 23:11:49 -0000 Received: from pcp01487930pcs.limstn01.de.comcast.net (HELO bishop.skife.org) (68.82.42.219) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2003 23:11:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bishop.skife.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CADBBC2F for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:15:07 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Shall we drop c/s mode? From: Brian McCallister To: OJB Developers List In-Reply-To: <1043622602.25153.28.camel@bishop.skife.org> References: <3E32D993.4050007@apache.org> <3E34036E.4020203@gmx.ch> <000701c2c55a$4f625c90$01a8a8c0@Eelco> <1043622602.25153.28.camel@bishop.skife.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1043622906.25149.31.camel@bishop.skife.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 26 Jan 2003 18:15:06 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Follow up to my previous: Re-read Thomas's original email - somehow I missed the 10x slower than running in singlejvm mode. Ouch. Ignore my thoughts on using it a "cheap" integration layer or anything else equally ridiculous. Goes back into hole to figure out OJB stuff. -Brian