Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29105 invoked by uid 98); 15 Jan 2003 11:04:35 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Received: (qmail 29086 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2003 11:04:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (63.251.56.142) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2003 11:04:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 57831 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2003 11:02:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 57824 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2003 11:02:59 -0000 Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (194.25.134.83) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2003 11:02:59 -0000 Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18YlKC-0007ho-01; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:03:12 +0100 Received: from win (510007636964-0001@[80.145.78.231]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18YlK7-0cpkESC; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:03:07 +0100 Message-ID: <004101c2bc85$ae23cfd0$6479fea9@win> Reply-To: "Armin Waibel" From: "Armin Waibel" To: "OJB Developers List" Subject: [pluggability of service classes] Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:03:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Sender: 510007636964-0001@t-dialin.net X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, I checked in some improvements: - make JdbcAccess, ConnectionManagerIF, StatementManager pluggable using ConfigurableFactory. All static methods of JdbcAccess now located in SqlHelper. - add serviceJdbcAccess() method to PB NOTE: Class ConnectionManager is no longer used (should we remove this class?). Instead use ConnectionManagerIF/ConnectionManagerImpl By the way, I do the 'performance2' (multi-threaded test) stress test with 0.98 and the CVS. Current CVS performs 15% faster in the multi-threaded test. (With single thread 'performance' test I got for both versions the same results, maybe CVS performs 1% slower). regards, Armin