db-jdo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: jdo 1.0 + jdo 2.0
Date Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:26:55 GMT
Hi Luc Claes,

JDO was designed to allow clean separation of application classes, so  
that you could mix and match implementations.

But maybe a more specific example of what you are trying to  
accomplish would help decide the issue.

Regards,

Craig

On Feb 26, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Luc Claes wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is it / should it be possible to handle simultaneously JDO 1.0 and  
> JDO 2.0 providers in the same application ?
> For instance, we would like to handle simultaneous accesses to  
> Versant's FastObjects (JDO 1) and JPOX 1.1 or another JDO 2 O/R  
> mapper. Unfortunately, it seems very unlikely that Versant will  
> ever upgrade its FastObjects Java API.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Luc Claes
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message