db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Fwd: Mandatory svnpubsub migration by Jan 2013
Date Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:40:36 GMT
Please read. We should discuss this at the weekly conference if not  
before (on email).

Craig

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Rick Hillegas <rick.hillegas@oracle.com>
> Date: December 3, 2012 7:43:34 AM PST
> To: private@db.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mandatory svnpubsub migration by Jan 2013
> Reply-To: private@db.apache.org
>
> The PMC has about a month left to perform the tasks outlined by the  
> attached email. I have tried to wrap my mind around what we need to  
> do. Here's what I understand.
>
> 1) The way it is today: Today the /www/db.apache.org directory on  
> minotaur holds the source for all of the content of the Apache db  
> website. Once an hour, a background process looks for changes to  
> the /www/db.apache.org directory tree. Changes are then propagated  
> to the actual production website. This is why you have to wait an  
> hour for your changes to actually turn up on the Apache website.
>
> 2) What is changing: As of January 2013, the /www/db.apache.org tree  
> will no longer be treated as the content source for the Apache db  
> website. The background process will be disabled. Changes made to  
> that directory tree will not be propagated to the Apache website.
>
> 3) What we need to do: There are three ways to migrate our content  
> so that changes will propagate to the Apache website:
>
> 3a) For content which is already under subversion control, there is  
> very little to do. We just have to create an INFRA issue telling the  
> Infrastructure team where the subversion source lives and what  
> Apache website address it corresponds to. Here are some examples of  
> these INFRA issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ 
> INFRA-5505, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5313, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4217

> .
>
> 3b) For content which is not already under subversion control, put  
> it under subversion control and then see step (3a).
>
> 3c) Alternatively, uncontrolled content can be re-produced using  
> Apache CMS. Apache CMS uses subversion as its repository. After  
> converting content to Apache CMS, I believe that we would need to  
> file an INFRA issue, telling the Infrastructure team to use the new  
> CMS source to populate the Apache website address.
>
> Here's the current status of website content for the DB projects:
>
> Already under subversion control:
>
>  - Derby (mostly)
>  - JDO
>
> Not already under subversion control:
>
>  - DB umbrella site (at db.apache.org)
>  - DdlUtils
>  - ObjectRelationalBridge
>  - Torque
>
> I volunteer to do the following tasks:
>
>  - Migrate Derby (to be described in a follow-up email)
>  - Migrate the DB umbrella site (basically ask the Infrastructure  
> team to use Kristian's CMS conversion, which is described here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5215)
>
> We need volunteers to migrate the following subprojects:
>
>  - JDO
>  - DdlUtils
>  - ObjectRelationalBridge
>  - Torque
>
> Thanks,
> -Rick
>
>
> On 2/9/12 2:47 AM, Kristian Waagan wrote:
>> On 08.02.2012 13:26, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> [PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST! DIRECT ALL FURTHER
>>> INQUIRIES TO infrastructure@apache.org]
>>
>> Seems like we have some decisions to make on this one.
>>
>> The email from Joe contains several different things we have to  
>> discuss. The two major items are:
>> o web site publishing
>> o release distribution
>>
>> Both of these must be performed by using svnpubsub before January  
>> 2013. Web site publishing applies to the DB TLP and the various  
>> subprojects, whereas release distribution applies to the  
>> subprojects only since the DB TLP doesn't release any artifacts.
>> Note that using the CMS is optional; if the project is checking in  
>> their generated site docs to a Subversion repository, svnpubsub can  
>> be setup to pull the site from there.
>>
>> Is the general mailing list the correct place to discuss the matter  
>> applying to the DB TLP?
>> Further, should each subproject discuss this on their respective  
>> dev lists?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message