db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Feb 10, 9 am Pacific Time
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:20:00 GMT
Attendees: Matthew Adams, Craig Russell

   Agenda:

   1. JDO 3.0.1 release status

Matthew has published 3.0.1 on Maven Central. The issue was that the  
signature was not detached.

Note when we release 3.1 we will need to publish the parent pom as  
well. That is, create a new project "parent" at the same level as  
"api" and "tck". AI Matthew update or create a new JIRA to track this  
issue.

   2. News on retire JDO Expert Group mail list?

no change

   3. News on JDO-696 "Throw on unrecognized javax.jdo options"? See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696

no change

   4. News on new feature idea http://osdir.com/ml/jdo-dev-db-apache/2011-11/msg00002.html

  - possible code contribution from 3M?

no change

   5. Everyone please review the ChangeLog: http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/ChangeLog

Pretty please

   6. What's needed to release 3.1? Go to https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10630

, click "Issues" in the menu on the left and then click "JDO 3  
maintenacnce release 1 (3.1)" under "Unresolved: By Version"

   Action Items from weeks past:

   [April 8 2011] AI Craig comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617 
  re the utility of the update operator.
   [Sep 23 2011] AI Michael document when changing dependencies (to  
DataNucleus) it's necessary to rebuild the exectck project before  
running tck.

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message