db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Jan 27, 9 am Pacific Time
Date Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:33:28 GMT
Attendees: Matthew Adams, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell

   Agenda:

   1. JDO 3.0.1 release status

no change.

   2. News on retire JDO Expert Group mail list?

no news. AI Craig see if there is some JCP requirement for a separate  
mail list.

   3. News on new feature idea http://osdir.com/ml/jdo-dev-db-apache/2011-11/msg00002.html

  - possible code contribution from 3M?

no change.

   4. New patch available JDO-702 "Support for specification of  
embedded inherited objects", see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702

   Patch has been applied. Spec update remains.

   5. What's needed to release 3.1? Go to https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10630

, click "Issues" in the menu on the left and then click "JDO 3  
maintenance release 1 (3.1)" under "Unresolved: By Version"

Craig updated the ChangeLog to reflect everything that is planned for  
3.1. AI Craig move some items from the PROPOSED list to the ACCEPTED  
list since they are already implemented. AI everyone please review the  
ChangeLog.

   6. Other issues

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696 AI Matthew look at the  
bug reported by Andy

Andy added a patch to set the configuration list in a file instead of  
hard coding. AI Michael review the patch.

   Action Items from weeks past:

   [April 8 2011] AI Craig comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617 
  re the utility of the update operator.
   [Sep 23 2011] AI Michael document when changing dependencies (to  
DataNucleus) it's necessary to rebuild the exectck project before  
running tck.

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message