Return-Path: 
 <jdo-dev-return-9270-apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive=www.apache.org@db.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 046D27FD8
	for <apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:44:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 54175 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2011 15:44:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jdo-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jdo-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <jdo-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54167 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2011 15:44:24 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:44:24 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.220.172] (HELO mail-vx0-f172.google.com)
 (209.85.220.172)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:44:20 +0000
Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11so842954vcb.31
        for <jdo-dev@db.apache.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.149.209 with SMTP id u17mr2043812vcv.245.1318434239364;
 Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.201.136 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201110121512.27792.andy@datanucleus.org>
References: 
 <CAGZB7Ria54fb=Gt9Wj2CuC8mBZCM6CRL85eQqWGTESKbaWbX-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <201110121512.27792.andy@datanucleus.org>
From: Matthew Adams <matthew@matthewadams.me>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:43:39 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGZB7RhZzcSBs9uxnhw_vDeMsCAa64J--hQDV4Rwk1yjEDP9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: JDO 3.0 dependency on JPA
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Well, the one I've used is this, which is in Maven central:

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId>
    <artifactId>javax.persistence</artifactId>
    <version>2.0.0</version>
</dependency>

EclipseLink is the RI for JPA 2.0, so it's the closest I think I we
can get to "official".  AFAIK, there are no releases with a groupId of
"javax.persistence" and artifactId of "persistence-api".

-matthew

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Andy Jefferson <andy@datanucleus.org> wrote:
>> I suggest changing the JDO-684 patch to specify
>> javax.persistence;version="[1.0.0,3.0.0)"
>
> Maybe
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> When are the JPA2 EG going to make the effort to actually provide a
> "javax.persistence" "persistence-api" 2.0 ? i.e official. Providing the API part
> of the JCP process any more?
>
> People often just use "geronimo-specs" jpa_2.0 v1.1, which exports
> "javax.persistence" as version="1.1" !!!
>
>
> --
> Andy
> DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org)
>



-- 
@matthewadams12
mailto:matthew@matthewadams.me
skype:matthewadams12
yahoo:matthewadams
aol:matthewadams12
google-talk:matthewadams12@gmail.com
msn:matthew@matthewadams.me
http://matthewadams.me
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams