db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Oct 14, 9 am Pacific Time
Date Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:41:51 GMT

On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Matthew Adams wrote:

> One minor clarification:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Craig L Russell
> <craig.russell@oracle.com> wrote:
>>  2.  JDO 3.0 dependency on JPA
>>
>> 3.0 (and 3.0.1) still depend on JPA 1.0. We decided that 3.1 did  
>> not allow
>> use of JPA 2.0 and it doesn't make sense to continue to support JPA  
>> 1.0.
>> Instead, we should just remove any dependency from JDO 3.0 API to  
>> JPA. Then,
>> we should look at the tck to see if there are any code dependencies.
>>
> This is true, except we are not removing JPA dependencies from JDO 3.0
> or 3.0.1, only from JDO 3.1, which is represented by the trunk at the
> time of this writing.  JDO 3.1 will not be dependent upon JPA 2.0, but
> JDO 2.0-3.0.1 will retain its dependence upon JPA 1.0.

My bad.

>> remove any dependency from JDO 3.0 API to JPA

s/3.0/3.1/

Craig
>
> -matthew

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message