db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthew T. Adams (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (JDO-683) Allow version field/property to be visible to application
Date Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:50:37 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13092878#comment-13092878

Matthew T. Adams commented on JDO-683:

For the @Version annotation, that's what I had intended to say.  See my second paragraph ("attribute"
refers to both field & property).  I like your suggestion of allowing <version>
to go under <field> or <property> better than mine.  We'll have to validate the
metadata, however, so that the user doesn't specify it both at the class level & the field/property

The proposed PMF & PM property controlling the behavior on setting the version attribute
was discussed on the conf call, because the user is not supposed to write to that field. 
As such, we felt we would disallow it by default, but still allow knowledgeable applications
to write the version attribute if they knew how their implementation would handle that situation.

> Allow version field/property to be visible to application
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JDO-683
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-683
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: api
>    Affects Versions: JDO 3 maintenance release 1
>            Reporter: Matthew T. Adams
>              Labels: jdo, jdouserexception, optimistic, transactions, version
> Currently, it requires a vendor extension to make the version attribute (field or property)
of a PC visible to the application.  Some knowledgeable applications may need not only read
access to the version field, but also write access to it.
> I propose that we allow version metadata to specify that a version attribute be application-visible.
 For annotation-based metadata, I recommend that it be allowed to be placed on fields &
methods.  For XML metadata, add XML attributes "attribute-name" to the "version" element that
allows the user to specify which field or property is to hold the application-visible version
> Along with this change would be verbiage in the spec noting that applications really
shouldn't change this value, but a knowledgeable application may change it, based on a new
PMF & PM property called something like "javax.jdo.option.OnVersionChangeByApplication"
with the following specified values.
> THROW:  (default) the implementation will throw JDOUserVersionChangeException (extends
JDOUserException) as early as the time the value is set, at the next flush, or at commit.
> IGNORE:  the implementation ignores the value the user set for the object's version
> ALLOW:  the implementation allows and uses the value the user set for the object's version
> This allows users to who know how their implementation behaves on user-modified version
values to take advantage of such behavior.
> All names proposed are up for discussion.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message