db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Apr 15, 9 am Pacific Time
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:02:20 GMT
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell


1. Typesafe queries for JDOQL - discussion.  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652

Are persistent interfaces intended to be supported? Michael has found  
that the company model causes DataNucleus preprocessor to fail. AI  
Michael file a DN JIRA.

The DN preprocessor only seems to process classes that have  
annotations. Is this the intent? Many JDO classes only have persistent  
metadata in the .jdo xml files, and these classes seem to be skipped.

Craig's understanding is that the pre-processor should be able to  
process classes even with no annotations at all. The decision as to  
which classes to process should be taken by the processor itself, not  
the javac that invokes it. But this is just intuition.

2. JDOQL : Bulk Update and Delete Operations  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617

  Some comments have been made about how to handle life cycle  
callbacks when instances are updated or deleted using the query  

3. Maven 2 upgrade https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-647

Michelle is still having trouble running TCK with the new machine  
(Windows 7).

4. Other issues

Action Items from weeks past:
[April 8 2011] AI Craig comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617 
  re the utility of the update operator.
  [Feb 25 2011] AI Michael, Craig, other volunteers: Look at  
Typesafe ...  query capability for JDOQL https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message