Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11155 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 00:22:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 00:22:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 32989 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 00:22:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 32979 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 00:22:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:22:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:22:31 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so2825521wwi.1 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.172.15 with SMTP id s15mr2450808wel.70.1291854127724; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:22:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.13 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:21:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Matthew Adams Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:21:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ant optional? To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a0860627a430496ef3a32 --0016e65a0860627a430496ef3a32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It already is. The scope is orthogonal to whether it's optional. -matthew On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: > > Hi guys, >> >> I was just looking at the pom in trunk/api and noticed that on line 133, >> the >> Ant dependency is declared optional. This is actually not true, as some >> of >> the code in the test project can't compile without it. I propose removing >> the line. Cool? >> > > The dependency should be marked "test" instead of "optional" then. > > Cool? > > Craig > >> >> -matthew >> >> -- >> mailto:matthew@matthewadams.me >> skype:matthewadams12 >> yahoo:matthewadams >> aol:matthewadams12 >> google-talk:matthewadams12@gmail.com >> >> > >> msn:matthew@matthewadams.me < >> msn%3Amatthew@matthewadams.me > >> >> http://matthewadams.me >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams >> > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > -- mailto:matthew@matthewadams.me skype:matthewadams12 yahoo:matthewadams aol:matthewadams12 google-talk:matthewadams12@gmail.com msn:matthew@matthewadams.me http://matthewadams.me http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams --0016e65a0860627a430496ef3a32--