Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83272 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 04:22:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 04:22:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 90204 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 04:22:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 90196 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2010 04:22:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:22:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.174] (HELO mail-px0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:21:58 +0000 Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so747674pxi.33 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.131.10 with SMTP id e10mr144843wfd.270.1291954895739; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.8.173.91] ([166.205.143.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x18sm3419728wfa.11.2010.12.09.20.21.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:21:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: ant optional? References: <201012090648.26851.andy@datanucleus.org> <201012090724.20065.andy@datanucleus.org>

From: Matthew Adams Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:21:24 -0800 To: "jdo-dev@db.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I can commit. Out of twin for weekend though. Will do next week.=20 Sent from mobile device. Responses brief. On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Craig L Russell wrote= : > Hi Matthew, >=20 > Go ahead and commit or if you don't have commit access (I forget) then ope= n a JIRA and attach a patch for one of us to commit. >=20 > Craig >=20 > On Dec 9, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: >=20 >> Maven's test scope only means that it needs to be on the test classpath. = It would not introduce a runtime or even compile time dependency of jdo-api= .jar. Optional means that if Maven can't find it, compilation should still s= ucceed, which it wouldn't if it weren't available. Again, and are orthogonal concerns. >>=20 >> -Matthew >>=20 >> Sent from mobile device. Responses brief. >>=20 >> On Dec 9, 2010, at 1:24 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: >>=20 >>>> You do not want to mark it as not optional since IIRC that would mean t= hat >>>> anything building against jdo-api.jar would have to have ant in the >>>> CLASSPATH. We do not want that. >>>=20 >>> Although maybe the "test" scope would override that requirement? >>>=20 >>> No subsititute for actually trying it with a clean M2 repo, and >>> building/running a simple JDO project against it (with clean M2 repo als= o). >>>=20 >>> --=20 >>> Andy >>> DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org) >=20 > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >=20