db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: ant optional?
Date Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:39:02 GMT

On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Matthew Adams wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I was just looking at the pom in trunk/api and noticed that on line  
> 133, the
> Ant dependency is declared optional.  This is actually not true, as  
> some of
> the code in the test project can't compile without it.  I propose  
> removing
> the <optional> line.  Cool?

The dependency should be marked "test" instead of "optional" then.

Cool?

Craig
>
> -matthew
>
> -- 
> mailto:matthew@matthewadams.me
> skype:matthewadams12
> yahoo:matthewadams
> aol:matthewadams12
> google-talk:matthewadams12@gmail.com<google-talk%3Amatthewadams12@gmail.com 
> >
> msn:matthew@matthewadams.me <msn%3Amatthew@matthewadams.me>
> http://matthewadams.me
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message