db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthew Adams <matt...@matthewadams.me>
Subject Re: ant optional?
Date Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:21:47 GMT
It already is.  The scope is orthogonal to whether it's optional.

-matthew

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Craig L Russell <craig.russell@oracle.com>wrote:

>
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Matthew Adams wrote:
>
>  Hi guys,
>>
>> I was just looking at the pom in trunk/api and noticed that on line 133,
>> the
>> Ant dependency is declared optional.  This is actually not true, as some
>> of
>> the code in the test project can't compile without it.  I propose removing
>> the <optional> line.  Cool?
>>
>
> The dependency should be marked "test" instead of "optional" then.
>
> Cool?
>
> Craig
>
>>
>> -matthew
>>
>> --
>> mailto:matthew@matthewadams.me
>> skype:matthewadams12
>> yahoo:matthewadams
>> aol:matthewadams12
>> google-talk:matthewadams12@gmail.com<google-talk%3Amatthewadams12@gmail.com>
>> <google-talk%3Amatthewadams12@gmail.com<google-talk%253Amatthewadams12@gmail.com>
>> >
>> msn:matthew@matthewadams.me <msn%3Amatthew@matthewadams.me> <
>> msn%3Amatthew@matthewadams.me <msn%253Amatthew@matthewadams.me>>
>>
>> http://matthewadams.me
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Oracle
> http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>


-- 
mailto:matthew@matthewadams.me
skype:matthewadams12
yahoo:matthewadams
aol:matthewadams12
google-talk:matthewadams12@gmail.com<google-talk%3Amatthewadams12@gmail.com>
msn:matthew@matthewadams.me <msn%3Amatthew@matthewadams.me>
http://matthewadams.me
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message