Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: <24556108.143241288366701293.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael Bouschen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (JDO-633) List.get(int) support in JDOQL is
 missing
In-Reply-To: <354259466.1245316987599.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-633?page=3Dcom.atlassian.ji=
ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1292631=
7#action_12926317 ]=20

Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-633:
--------------------------------------

I checked in the code refactoring (see revision 1026673)

Proposed spec changes:
Add an entry in table 5  Query Methods in chapter 14.6.2 Filter specificati=
on, section Methods on page 170 of the JDO 3.0 spec:
get(int) applies to List types


> List.get(int) support in JDOQL is missing
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-633
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-633
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: specification, tck
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 2
>            Reporter: Timo Westk=C3=A4mper
>            Assignee: Michael Bouschen
>             Fix For: JDO 3 maintenance release 1
>
>         Attachments: list_get_method.patch
>
>
> It would be nice to get List.get(int) into JDOQL, in other words access o=
f indexed list elements.
> Querydsl has support for that and for consistency it would be nice if JDO=
QL supported it as well.

--=20
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.