Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: <17991775.81661276880363291.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:59:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michelle Caisse (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (JDO-616) Bookmark formatting incorrectly
 represents indent level of subhead vs. subsection
In-Reply-To: <606524195.1227296504294.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12880246#action_12880246 ] 

Michelle Caisse commented on JDO-616:
-------------------------------------

One issue is that subheads are sometimes used in the spec without a numbered subsection above them. That is, hierarchy levels are skipped. Possibly the best solution is to remove subheads from the bookmarks altogether. 

We should decide also if links to tables and figures should appear in the bookmarks within the chapter links. This is unconventional, but possibly useful. On the other hand, given that the bookmarks contain a link to the Table of Figures and Table of Tables, in which each figure and table is listed, users should easily be able to find figures and tables.

> Bookmark formatting incorrectly represents indent level of subhead vs. subsection
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-616
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-616
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: specification
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 2
>            Reporter: Michelle Caisse
>            Assignee: Michelle Caisse
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: JDO 3
>
>
> In the bookmarks (sidebar TOC) of the specification pdf, subheads (unnumbered) have a higher indent level than subsections (numbered, e.g. 11.1.1). This is incorrect; their hierarchical rank should be reversed. The levels in the TOC itself are correct.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.