Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: <12166372.9451272295291441.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:21:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Peter Dettman (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Created: (JDO-653) Extra checks in PMF.close tests
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Extra checks in PMF.close tests
-------------------------------

                 Key: JDO-653
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-653
             Project: JDO
          Issue Type: Test
          Components: tck2
    Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 2
            Reporter: Peter Dettman


Some of the implications of section 11.4 don't appear to be checked for in the case of an already-closed PersistenceManagerFactory.

1. If close() is called on an already-closed PMF (with correct permission i.e. "closePersistenceManagerFactory"), no exception should be thrown.

2. If close() is called on an already-closed PMF (without correct permission), exception should be thrown (even though it would otherwise do nothing).

3. If close() fails (throws JDOUserException) due to active transaction(s), then none of the PersistenceManager objects belonging to the PMF should have actually been closed.

4. Several get/set pairs are not tested for their behaviour after close()


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.