db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Mar 26, 9 am PDT
Date Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:57:43 GMT
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell


1. Query Cancel TCK tests

With the latest tests it seems that the big job in query is during  
ResultSet.next() instead of Statement.execute(). Next try to write  
lock some instances and see if that affects the behavior.

2. Tests in api2 for ... getPersistenceManagerFactory(Map,Map) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-557

  Making progress; a bit of reorganization and testing is still needed.

3. Metadata tests Andy says that the latest snapshots of DataNucleus  
contain a fix for the getParent() returning nothing. AI Craig test  
with the SNAPSHOT version.

4. Spec updates No changes since last week.

5. Other issues

NoSQL might be a good way to improve JDO's visibility. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651

JDO was designed to support non-SQL datastores. In fact, the first RI  
was a distinctly non-SQL implementation, essentially a key-value  
store. What needs to be done for NoSQL in general is to go through the  
specification in detail and highlight those parts that cannot now be  
implemented reasonably by a key-value store, or a non-transactional  
datastore. NoSQL is probably too big a description of the kinds of  
datastores that makes sense for JDO to support. Part of the exercise  
should be to categorize the NoSQL datastores to focus on those  
categories that make sense for JDO.

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message