From jdo-dev-return-8407-apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive=www.apache.org@db.apache.org Fri Dec 11 18:06:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17099 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2009 18:06:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2009 18:06:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 71599 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2009 18:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 71584 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2009 18:06:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:06:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.43.132] (HELO sca-es-mail-1.sun.com) (192.18.43.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:06:36 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id nBBI6FUj000254 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:06:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; delsp=yes; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KUI0000022CQQ00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for jdo-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:06:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (c-24-23-181-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.23.181.209]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KUI00GEV2A63110@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for jdo-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:06:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:06:06 -0800 From: Craig L Russell Subject: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Dec 11, 9 am PDT In-reply-to: <4B22473A.3040707@sonic.net> Sender: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Cc: JDO Expert Group Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE References: <4966C3D9.9050408@sun.com> <49C317D5.1010802@sonic.net> <49CC57AA.4010002@sonic.net> <49D57284.9060605@sonic.net> <49DEC353.50800@sonic.net> <49E89659.20407@sonic.net> <49FA754D.8040502@sonic.net> <4A03A33A.3080207@sonic.net> <4A0CDC4C.1000509@sonic.net> <4A162177.3080701@sonic.net> <4A1F59A8.2060806@sonic.net> <4A2890B4.4080900@sonic.net> <4A31CD23.8000700@sonic.net> <9b395875bd5ea7ddc2a1d2b6501e6107.squirrel@webmail.sonic.net> <4A44AA50.6040502@sonic.net> <4A4D7EB5.5040403@sonic.net> <4A56CA0A.2070701@sonic.net> <4A692712.7040809@sonic.net> <4A7BAD06.6000601@sonic.net> <4A84E4BC.6000700@sonic.net> <4A975B37.4030308@sonic.net> <4AA9BC96.1040009@sonic.net> <4AB305C0.6010208@sonic.net> <4ABC4512.7030603@sonic.net> <4AC56BC6.20206@sonic.net> <4ACE9FFE.7040209@sonic.net> <4AD7ECDC.8080705@sonic.net> <4AE114D1.9000207@sonic.net> <4AEAEAE5.5040409@sonic.net> <4AFCC79A.5010000@sonic.net> <4B06156E.7000103@sonic.net> <4B187F7B.9050207@sonic.net> <4B22473A.3040707@sonic.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. Query timeout in JDO / Update timeout - Done deal? No negative feedback. Positive feedback from J=F6rg and Michael. AI = =20 Craig prepare a patch for discussion of the details. 2. Other issues Looks like there is agreement on the syntax of the conditional query = =20 proposal. This would be for "the next release". We should close JDO 2.3 pretty soon. Open JIRA issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-557 AI Michelle update the = =20 status https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-558 AI Craig test with = =20 latest DataNucleus and update status https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615 needs a simple test cas= e =20 to exercise all public APIs. Volunteers? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-616 will be taken care of = =20 with the next printing of the spec https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-619 too late for 2.3. Revie= w =20 for next release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623 AI Craig prepare a patc= h =20 with changes as discussed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-630 needs a simple test = =20 case. Volunteers? Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!