Return-Path: 
 <jdo-dev-return-8242-apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive=www.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61884 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 12:50:53 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 12:50:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 93676 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2009 12:50:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jdo-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jdo-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <jdo-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93666 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2009 12:50:53 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:50:53 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [195.243.100.246] (HELO mail.versant.net) (195.243.100.246)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:50:41 +0000
Received: from nali.versant.com ([192.168.10.183]:1646
 helo=hamburg1.versant.com)
	by mail.versant.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <CRomberg@versant.com>)
	id 1MWV5O-0002v0-11; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:50:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200907301329.33494.andy@datanucleus.org>
References: 
 <OF44BCAA98.9E13FDB7-ONC1257603.003DF06F-C1257603.003EFEE1@versant.com>
 <200907301329.33494.andy@datanucleus.org>
To: Andy Jefferson <andy@datanucleus.org>
Cc: Christian Ernst <cernst@versant.com>,
	jdo-dev@db.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: broken tests in TCK testsuite
X-KeepSent: 70EE1150:06682E3C-C1257603:0045B912;
 type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0 August 02, 2007
Message-ID: 
 <OF70EE1150.06682E3C-ONC1257603.0045B912-C1257603.00468ABD@versant.com>
From: CRomberg@versant.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:50:18 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on hamburg1/SERVER/VERSANT(Release
 8.5|December 05, 2008) at
 30.07.2009 14:50:18,
	Serialize complete at 30.07.2009 14:50:18
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=_alternative 00468ABCC1257603_="
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--=_alternative 00468ABCC1257603_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Hi Andy,

I've checked 2.0, it's not in there, so it must have been introduced 
post-2.0.

However I still have concerns with this approach:
Normally PMFs are constructed via the static helper method contained in 
the vendor's PMF implementation.
This introduces an alternative code path, which e.g. in our implementation 
is not the same, because
our BootstrapPMF implementation decides based on certain properties which 
PMF implementation is actually
used.

Best regards,

Christian



From:
Andy Jefferson <andy@datanucleus.org>
To:
jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Cc:
CRomberg@versant.com, Christian Ernst <cernst@versant.com>
Date:
30.07.2009 14:39
Subject:
Re: broken tests in TCK testsuite



> I hope this is the right list to report broken tests in the TCK 
testsuite,
> I'm referring to TCK 2.0, ignore my post if these issues are resolved
> meanwhile:
> The following tests are broken, because they rely on a no-args ctor

Hi Christian,

Maybe I'm missing something but if I look at spec (JDO2.2 in my case, but 
not 
sure what version it appeared in - likely post-JDO2.0) section 11.1

<spec>
The PersistenceManagerFactory implementation class must implement a 
no-args 
constructor. This allows the standard Java 6 service discovery 
implementation 
to create a factory instance ...
</spec>


-- 
Andy
DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org)



--=_alternative 00468ABCC1257603_=--