Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54575 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 12:30:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 12:30:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 63311 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2009 12:30:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 63301 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2009 12:30:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:30:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.159.7.99] (HELO relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net) (212.159.7.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:29:55 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAGMvcUrUnw4S/2dsb2JhbADST4QRBYFJ Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net ([212.159.14.18]) by relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2009 13:29:34 +0100 Received: from [87.113.64.162] (helo=[192.168.0.100]) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1MWUlK-000882-2s; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:29:34 +0100 From: Andy Jefferson To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: broken tests in TCK testsuite Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:29:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: CRomberg@versant.com, Christian Ernst References: In-Reply-To: Organization: DataNucleus MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907301329.33494.andy@datanucleus.org> X-Plusnet-Relay: 9642667e6650b0c57b58f0c716fdf3a4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I hope this is the right list to report broken tests in the TCK testsuite, > I'm referring to TCK 2.0, ignore my post if these issues are resolved > meanwhile: > The following tests are broken, because they rely on a no-args ctor Hi Christian, Maybe I'm missing something but if I look at spec (JDO2.2 in my case, but not sure what version it appeared in - likely post-JDO2.0) section 11.1 The PersistenceManagerFactory implementation class must implement a no-args constructor. This allows the standard Java 6 service discovery implementation to create a factory instance ... -- Andy DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org)