Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: Andy Jefferson <andy@datanucleus.org>
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r772124 - in /db/jdo/branches/2.3-ea/lib/ext:
 fscontext.jar providerutil.jar
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:56:48 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <20090506095553.97D5B23888CA@eris.apache.org>
 <200905061553.25278.andy@datanucleus.org>
 <C6174C3C-722F-4B35-904F-B09666CAA1BB@SUN.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6174C3C-722F-4B35-904F-B09666CAA1BB@SUN.com>
Organization: DataNucleus
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905061656.48996.andy@datanucleus.org>

Hi Craig,

> > Ahh but they weren't in the release. They were in SVN. The "release"
> > distribution doesn't have them.
>
> I don't follow. The files were checked into the releases/2.3-ea
> directory in svn. Was checking them in part of the release process?

No, but then the instructions for release aren't simple. They were 
under "db/jdo/**branches** not **releases**, so my previous reply was simply 
to verify if the license of aforementioned jars prohibits existence in SVN; 
they aren't being distributed. Either way they aren't there now.

> > Wish you people would sort your licenses out, then
> > none of this would be a problem ;-)
>
> Who is "you people"? Sun, who don't release these jars under a license
> that Apache finds suitable?

Just my vain attempt at humour. There was a smiley. I'll stick to serious 
stuff from now on :-)


-- 
Andy  (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)