db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Enhancer specification text for discussion
Date Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:37:18 GMT
Hi Ilan,

On Dec 22, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Ilan Kirsh wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>
>>> Is class name supported?
>> That's an open question in my mind. How would you propose that the   
>> enhancer find the file corresponding to the class?
>> 1. The class loader might not want to give you access to the file,   
>> especially for example if it was loaded from a jar. In that case,  
>> what  you need is the path to the jar or the resource name of the  
>> jar.
>> 2. As far as I know, there's no reverse translation of class loader  
>> +  class name to file name.
>
> It is just more user friendly to let the user specify a class name  
> and let
> the implementation convert the class name into resource name by adding
> a ".class" suffix and replacing '.' with '/'.

This will fail if the class to be enhanced is in a jar file, right? Do  
we warn users about this problem?

Craig
>
>
> I don't suggest other changes, so the class will be loaded as a  
> resource
> and "-d" will still be required in this case.
>
> Ilan

Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message