+1 for release.

I've checked signatures and checksums, run RAT, and run both tck and  
legacy tck with JPOX 1.2.0.

Everything looks good.

I've filed JDO-583 for the signature files that don't have Apache  
license headers. This is due to a limitation of the program that  
parses the signature files; the program does not allow comments. This  
is proposed to be fixed for the next maintenance release of JDO.

Craig

On Mar 18, 2008, at 2:09 PM, Michelle Caisse wrote:

> This vote is to release the Apache JDO 2.1 specification, TCK, and  
> API (both legacy and current versions) with the projects that they  
> depend on: enhancer, model, and util.
>
> [+1] Release JDO 2.1 specification, api, tck, enhancer, model, and  
> util
> [0] Don't care
> [-1] Don't releaseJDO 2.1 specification, api, tck, enhancer, model,  
> and util because:
>
>
>
> The specification is available at http://db.apache.org/jdo/specifications.html 
> . The TCK can be tested from the staging area, http://people.apache.org/~mcaisse/jdo2.1-rc2/dist 
> . Please follow the directions at http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/ReleaseTesting2dot1 
>  for downloading and testing. It would be useful if you would record  
> the results of your testing there.
>
> Please test and vote. Voting will close at noon PDT Monday, March 24.
>
> -- Michelle
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!