db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andy Jefferson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JDO-576) Create new tests for getting a pmf using jdoconfig.xml
Date Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:21:08 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569144#action_12569144

Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-576:

Tests for jdoconfig dont pass with datastore identity, only app identity
Tests for persistence.xml and JDOHelper assume that the EMF will also implement PMF, and JPOX
doesn't implement its EMF that way - they are separate classes. This is an implementation
level detail IMHO - as the method JDOHelper.getPersistenceManagerFactory it is user error
if the EMF doesnt also implement PMF.

When calling JDOHelper(persistence-unit-name), JDOHelper could do as if the user had instead
passed in a Properties with a single property "javax.jdo.option.PersistenceUnitName" set to
the puName. In this case JPOX would return a PMF for that persistence-unit. This currently
isn't part of JDOHelpers logic AFAIK

> Create new tests for getting a pmf using jdoconfig.xml
> ------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JDO-576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-576
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: tck2, tck2-legacy
>            Reporter: Michelle Caisse
>            Assignee: Michelle Caisse
>             Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
> New tests are needed to test getting a persistence manager factory with JDOHelper.getPersistenceManagerFactory()
and JDOHelper.getPersistenceManagerFactory(String name);

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message