Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28847 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2007 16:51:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2007 16:51:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23697 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2007 16:51:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 2343 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2007 16:36:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Reply-To: From: "Robert Greene" To: , Cc: "JDO Expert Group" Subject: RE: JDO 2.1 specification draft can be reviewed... Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:35:47 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-reply-to: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2007 16:36:15.0717 (UTC) FILETIME=[2AFFD150:01C8126E] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org BTW - It's probably just a matter of rearranging and/or eliminating a few things. For example, there is a lot of good content on JPA, there is just also a lot of out dated stuff. Robert Charles Greene V.P. Product Strategy Versant Corporation 255 Shoreline Dr #450 Redwood City, CA 94065 Office: (650)232-2431 Cell: (925)577-4634 -----Original Message----- From: Robert Greene [mailto:rgreene@versant.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:33 AM To: Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM; jdo-dev@db.apache.org Cc: JDO Expert Group Subject: RE: JDO 2.1 specification draft can be reviewed... I think if we're going to put a story on the serverside, we ought to revisit some of the content of the site. For example, "Why JDO" still refers to J2EE Entity Beans, Toplink, Hibernate, etc. Perhaps it is time to update to address JPA and put a statement in place about how JDO fits in with how alternatives have evolved over the last 3 years. Cheers, -Robert Robert Charles Greene V.P. Product Strategy Versant Corporation 255 Shoreline Dr #450 Redwood City, CA 94065 Office: (650)232-2431 Cell: (925)577-4634 -----Original Message----- From: Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM [mailto:Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 8:49 AM To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Cc: JDO Expert Group Subject: Re: JDO 2.1 specification draft can be reviewed... It would be nice if we could get the jdocentral.com redirect to http://db.apache.org/jdo/jdocentral in place first. Does anyone have any influence to get this to happen? -- Michelle Joerg von Frantzius wrote: >Hi Craig, > >I think that's worth some "Apache JDO site relaunched" story on >serverside, isn't it? >The site is really much better now, and one can quickly see what it's >all about (whereas before that was only understandable for spec addicts, >and that only after due studying the site). > >Regards, >J�rg > >Craig L Russell schrieb: > > >>Hi Joerg, >> >>Andy Jefferson has put in a ton of work to upgrade the site. >> >>Craig >> >>On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Joerg von Frantzius wrote: >> >> >> >>>Wow! Is that really the site I used to know as apache's jdo site?! >>> >>>Andy Jefferson schrieb: >>> >>> >>>>On 19 October 2007, David Ezzio (ys) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>http://db.apache.org/jdo/documentation.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>http://db.apache.org/jdo/specifications.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>Craig Russell >>Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo >>408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com >>P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> > > >