db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Annotations for embedded Key, Value, and Element
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:02:18 GMT
Hi Andy,

On Jul 25, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Andy Jefferson wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>> I disagree on that placement of the other flags, back on to
>> @Field/@Property. They relate specifically to the element, key,  
>> value so
>> keep them on the associated annotation would be my vote. So then  
>> it really
>> comes down to namings of the global flag, and the mapping details
>> 1. "embedded", "embeddedMapping"
>> 2. "embeddedElement", "embedded"
> This seems to have been ignored (by the most recent check in) and  
> users can no
> longer specify the equivalent of "embedded-element" on the @Element
> (similarly embedded-key on @Key, embedded-value on @Value). I would  
> like them
> reinstated, as per the above proposal.

Right about that. I've added back embedded to Key, Value, and  
Element. And changed the Embedded[] embedded to embeddedMapping.


> -- 
> Andy  (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message