db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michelle Caisse <Michelle.Cai...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Embedding fields of non-persistent types even when field-type is used
Date Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:45:19 GMT
I think that this is just an issue with the declarations in the classes. 
In the PI classes, the address fields were declared as I*, whereas I 
think we really wanted them to be PI*. With this change, the address 
fields are instances of persistent interfaces, and there should be no 

-- Michelle

Craig L Russell wrote:

> On Jul 27, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Michelle Caisse wrote:
>> JPOX doesn't support embedding fields of non-persistent types even  
>> when the field-type attribute is used to specify the specific type.  
>> The TCK now uses inheritance from non-persistent interfaces, which  
>> allowed us to simplify the coding of new pc classes, but doesn't  
>> work with the embedded Address field.
> This is an issue. Is JPOX able to fix this? The alternatives are not  
> pretty, since we use both persistent classes and persistent  
> interfaces in the model. The setAddress(IAddress) methods need to be  
> implementable by both the persistence provider and the tck code.
> Any ideas?
> Craig
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message