db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig Russell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JDO-496) Add just "name" property to PMF, in addition to "persistenceUnitName"
Date Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:03:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511492

Craig Russell commented on JDO-496:

Making this change will break implementations that do not include get/setName in the PersistenceManagerFactory.

Are we ready for this?

> Add just "name" property to PMF, in addition to "persistenceUnitName"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JDO-496
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-496
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: api2, api2-legacy
>            Reporter: Matthew T. Adams
>            Assignee: Matthew T. Adams
>             Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
> Add a property called "name" to PMF and use it to find named PMFs via jdoconfig.xml lookup,
and support property "persistenceUnitName" as another PMF property.  A named PMF may also
contain a persistenceUnitName property, which is passed along to the PMF implementation.
> We need to clarify the desired behavior if no named PMF is found via the name property.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message