db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig Russell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JDO-403) JDO2 Annotations
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:50:26 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503965

Craig Russell commented on JDO-403:

The annotations containing boolean element types are problematic due to the inability of annotations
to properly handle the tri-state "true, false, not-specified". Many of the annotation elements
are tri-state, e.g. Field defaultFetchGroup. This defaults to true for a specific list of
field types, and false for the remaining types. The user can override the default.

With annotations, if you define defaultFetchGroup as a boolean type you must either require
the user to specify a value or define a default. The problem is that the annotation processor
cannot distinguish between the user specifying a value and the default. So the defaultFetchGroup
element is properly defined as String with a default of "".

The issue comes where some of the elements are defined to be boolean and others defined to
be String. I think it's confusing for users to have to remember whether they are supposed
to type, e.g. @Field(defaultFetchGroup="true") or @Field(defaultFetchGroup=true).

My preference is to define all of the boolean elements as String. Where the xml defines the
default as IMPLIED, the default value is ""; and where the xml defines the default as true,
the default value is "true". This gives us the best user experience with the small downside
of not having compile-time checking of true/false and the requirement to enclose boolean values
in quotes, just like xml.

> JDO2 Annotations
> ----------------
>                 Key: JDO-403
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: api2
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
>            Reporter: Andy Jefferson
>            Assignee: Michelle Caisse
>             Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>         Attachments: jdo_2_1_annotations.jar
> It would be desirable for JDO2 to have its own set of annotations. We have developed
a set within JPOX that would likely serve as a starting point for such a set. In my opinion
they should be
> 1. Split into javax.jdo.annotations.jdo and javax.jdo.annotations.orm
> 2. Move ORM attributes from some of the JDO annotations and have a ORM annotation.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message