db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Bengtson <e...@jpox.org>
Subject Re: Persistent interface specification clarification
Date Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:38:46 GMT
Quoting Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM>:

> o the interface must be mapped to a table; portable applications will use the
> table attribute for this purpose

pc classes too. (inheritance strategy applies equals)

> o all persistent properties must be mapped to columns; portable applications
> will use the column attribute of the property element contained in the
> element

pc classes too.

> o interfaces that are of types of relationships declared as
> persistent properties of the parameter interface must all be
> completely mapped

Persistent properties, typed with an interface type, should not differ from
persistent fields.

why r these specified? I don't remember where the distinction of PC Classes or
PC Interfaces appears.

View raw message