Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23751 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2007 18:36:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2007 18:36:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 9745 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2007 18:36:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 9693 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2007 18:36:59 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:36:59 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:36:51 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41FA7142BD for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:36:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <10493260.1169058990996.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:36:30 -0800 (PST) From: "Ilan Kirsh (JIRA)" To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (JDO-403) JDO2 Annotations In-Reply-To: <27400996.1153995313858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465491 ] Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-403: -------------------------------- After adding @Transient, maybe @Transactional and @Persistent should also be added and the FieldPersistenceModifier enum + the Field's persistenceModifier attribute should be removed. > JDO2 Annotations > ---------------- > > Key: JDO-403 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403 > Project: JDO > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: api2 > Affects Versions: JDO 2 final > Reporter: Andy Jefferson > Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1 > > Attachments: annotations.jar > > > It would be desirable for JDO2 to have its own set of annotations. We have developed a set within JPOX that would likely serve as a starting point for such a set. In my opinion they should be > 1. Split into javax.jdo.annotations.jdo and javax.jdo.annotations.orm > 2. Move ORM attributes from some of the JDO annotations and have a ORM annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira