db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Bengtson <e...@jpox.org>
Subject Re: JDOQL query problems (JPOX issues?)
Date Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:06:44 GMT
Craig,

I understand that variables of PC get bound to a set of pc type, but strings...
What is it bound to?

rgds

Quoting Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM>:

> Hi Erik,
>
> On Oct 28, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > I was reading Craig comments and noted that "str" is an unbound
> > variable
>
> The variable "str" is bound by the filter q.setFilter
> ("this.stringCol.contains(str)").
>
> Craig
> > a parameter, and now I think the query is invalid since there is no
> > value for
> > str.
> >
> > Unbound variables are not null values.
> >
> > Quoting Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM>:
> >
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >>  From the spec,
> >> <spec>
> >> The candidate tuples
> >> are the cartesian product of the candidate class and all variables
> >> used in the result. The re-
> >> sult tuples are the tuples of the candidate class and all variables
> >> used in the result that sat-
> >> isfy the filter. The result is the collection of result expressions
> >> projected from the result
> >> tuples.
> >> </spec>
> >>
> >> On Oct 27, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm having problems running JDOQL queries that group by a variable.
> >>> I think the queries below are valid, but I would like to double
> >>> check this. If you agree that the queries are valid JDOQL, I will
> >>> check the TCK to add these queries to existing TCK tests or add new
> >>> test cases. I tried the queries with JPOX version 1.1.3 and with
> >>> the nightly build from Oct 27 (no difference). I will send a test
> >>> case to reproduce the problem to Erik and Andy, since I cannot
> >>> attach archives here.
> >>>
> >>> The class model is simple: pc class A has a field stringCol which
> >>> is a collection of strings and another field bCol which is a
> >>> collection of instances of class B.
> >>>
> >>> The following query groups the class A instances by the strings in
> >>> their string collection:
> >>>  Query q = pm.newQuery(A.class);
> >>>  q.declareVariables("java.lang.String str");
> >>>  q.setFilter("this.stringCol.contains(str)");
> >>>  q.setGrouping("str");
> >>>  q.setResult("str");
> >>
> >> The cartesian product of the candidate class and all variables is a
> >> the cartesian product of all A instances and all strings contained in
> >> any stringCol. The result tuples consist of tuples of (A, String)
> >> where the elements of stringCol are projected and associated with the
> >> instances of A whence they came. The result comes from grouping and
> >> projecting the String from the result tuple. So,
> >>
> >> This query should collect all of the unique strings in all instances
> >> of A stringCol. The result is a List<String>. I don't know offhand
> >> how the implementation can do this trick (returning a List<Object> in
> >> which each element is a String is easy).
> >>
> >>> This results in an exception:
> >>>  JDOUserException: Unable to find the field "str" in the candidate
> >>> class. It is possible that this field is a field in a subclass, but
> >>> it is illegal to reference fields directly when they are in a
> >>> subclass.
> >>>
> >>> I get a different exception when adding an aggregate to the result
> >>> clause
> >>>  q.setResult("str, count(this)");
> >>>  JDOUserException: Unconstrained variable referenced: str
> >>
> >> This query should collect all of the unique strings in all instances
> >> of A stringCol, count them, and return the string and count of
> >> occurrences. The result is a List<Object[ ]> Each element consists of
> >> an Object[ ] containing a String in element 0 and a Long in
> >> element 1.
> >>>
> >>> The behavior is different when iterating a collection of pc
> >>> instances:
> >>>   Query q = pm.newQuery(A.class);
> >>>   q.declareVariables("model.B b");
> >>>   q.setFilter("this.bCol.contains(b)");
> >>>   q.setGrouping("b");
> >>>   q.setResult("count(this), b");
> >>> This results in:
> >>>  JDOUserException: The result clause has a field expression
> >>> "UnboundVariable "UNBOUND_B.ID"" that doesnt appear in the
> >>> grouping. Any result specification has to be present in the
> >>> grouping when grouping is specified.
> >>
> >> This query should collect all of the unique B instances in all
> >> instances of A bCol, count them, and return the B and count of
> >> occurrences. The result is a List<Object[ ]> Each element consists of
> >> an Object[ ] containing a B in element 0 and a Long in element 1.
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>>
> >>> Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Regards Michael
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Michael Bouschen		Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
> >>> mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de	http://www.tech.spree.de/
> >>> Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33		Buelowstr. 66
> >>> Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012		D-10783 Berlin
> >>>
> >>
> >> Craig Russell
> >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/
> >> jdo
> >> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>




Mime
View raw message